"By far the most important person in my career, of course, was
Hans Eysenck. I spent two years with him as a postdoc and another
year on my first sabbatical leave from Berkeley. From his writings, I
had great expectations of Eysenck when I went to England to work
in his department, and they were more than fulfilled. Eysenck was a
kind of genius, or at least a person of very unusual talents, and the
only person of that unusual caliber that I have come across in the
field of psychology. I have known a number of very capable and truly
outstanding persons in psychology, and persons whose scientific contributions
are on a par with, or may even exceed, Eysenck’s, but none
who were what I would think of as some kind of phenomenon. I got perhaps as much as 90 percent of my attitudes about psychology
and science from Eysenck. The three years I spent in his
department have been a lasting source of inspiration. I dread to think
where my own career might have gone had I never made the Eysenck
connection. I think Eysenck was a great man and have written in
detail about my impressions of him."
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen