Posts mit dem Label Oral Contraceptives werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Oral Contraceptives werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Dienstag, 16. September 2014

ORAL CONTRACEPTION AND ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS – FROM THE LAB TO THE REAL WORLD

ORAL CONTRACEPTION AND ROMANTIC  RELATIONSHIPS – FROM THE LAB TO THE REAL  WORLD 
S. Craig Roberts, Kelly D. Cobey, Kateřina Klapilová & Jan Havlíček (2014)


Abstract

We review recent evidence that suggests that hormonal contraceptives may influence the dynamics of sexual relationships and the human pair-bond. Hormonal contraception likely has positive effects on cementing the pair-bond by decoupling sex from conception. However, changes in women’s evolved mate preferences associated with initiation or discontinuation of hormonal contraception may alter attraction to her partner, with potentially negative consequences for relationship satisfaction. We describe the evidence for such changes produced by laboratory studies, including prospective experimental designs, and how the consequences of such changes are being explored beyond the laboratory. In view of the growing prevalence of modern hormonal contraceptive methods across the globe, further study of such effects is urgently required.

Sonntag, 17. August 2014

Partner Choice, Relationship Satisfaction, and Oral Contraception: The Congruency Hypothesis

Partner Choice, Relationship Satisfaction, and Oral Contraception: The Congruency Hypothesis
S. Craig Roberts, Anthony C. Little, Robert P. Burriss, Kelly D. Cobey, Kateřina Klapilová, Jan Havlíček, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa DeBruine, and Marion Petrie (2014)
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/94078/1/94078.pdf


Abstract

Hormonal fluctuation across the menstrual cycle explains temporal variation in women’s judgment of the attractiveness of members of the opposite sex. Use of hormonal contraceptives could therefore influence both initial partner choice and, if contraceptive use subsequently changes, intrapair dynamics. Associations between hormonal contraceptive use and relationship satisfaction may thus be best understood by considering whether current use is congruent with use when relationships formed, rather than by considering current use alone. In the study reported here, we tested this congruency hypothesis in a survey of 365 couples. Controlling for potential confounds (including relationship duration, age, parenthood, and income), we found that congruency in current and previous hormonal contraceptive use, but not current use alone, predicted women’s sexual satisfaction with their partners. Congruency was not associated with women’s nonsexual satisfaction or with the satisfaction of their male partners. Our results provide empirical support for the congruency hypothesis and suggest that women’s sexual satisfaction is influenced by changes in partner preference associated with change in hormonal contraceptive use.