Posts mit dem Label Inbreeding Depression werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Inbreeding Depression werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2014

An Association Between the Kinship and Fertility of Human Couples

An Association Between the Kinship and Fertility of Human Couples
Agnar Helgason et al.; 2008


Abstract

Previous studies have reported that related human couples tend to produce more children than unrelated couples but have been unable to determine whether this difference is biological or stems from socioeconomic variables. Our results, drawn from all known couples of the Icelandic population born between 1800 and 1965, show a significant positive association between kinship and fertility, with the greatest reproductive success observed for couples related at the level of third and fourth cousins. Owing to the relative socioeconomic homogeneity of Icelanders, and the observation of highly significant differences in the fertility of couples separated by very fine intervals of kinship, we conclude that this association is likely to have a biological basis.


See also: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/322/5908/1634.2.full.pdf 
(Comment on “An Association Between the Kinship and Fertility of Human Couples” - Rodrigo Labouriau and António Amorim; 2008)



[Thanks @ Tomás]

Dienstag, 5. November 2013

Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis Nematodes

Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis Nematodes
Elie S Dolgin et al.; 2007


Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans reproduces primarily by self-fertilization of hermaphrodites, yet males are present at low frequencies in natural populations (androdioecy). The ancestral state of C. elegans was probably gonochorism (separate males and females), as in its relative C. remanei. Males may be maintained in C. elegans because outcrossed individuals escape inbreeding depression. The level of inbreeding depression is, however, expected to be low in such a highly selfing species, compared with an outcrosser like C. remanei. To investigate these issues, we measured life-history traits in the progeny of inbred versus outcrossed C. elegans and C. remanei individuals derived from recently isolated natural populations. In addition, we maintained inbred lines of C. remanei through 13 generations of full-sibling mating. Highly inbred C. remanei showed dramatic reductions in brood size and relative fitness compared to outcrossed individuals, with evidence of both direct genetic and maternal-effect inbreeding depression. This decline in fitness accumulated over time, causing extinction of nearly 90% of inbred lines, with no evidence of purging of deleterious mutations from the remaining lines. In contrast, pure strains of C. elegans performed better than crosses between strains, indicating outbreeding depression. The results are discussed in relation to the evolution of androdioecy and the effect of mating system on the level of inbreeding depression.

Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management

Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management
Suzanne Edmands; 2007
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03148.x/full


Abstract

As populations become increasingly fragmented, managers are often faced with the dilemma that intentional hybridization might save a population from inbreeding depression but it might also induce outbreeding depression. While empirical evidence for inbreeding depression is vastly greater than that for outbreeding depression, the available data suggest that risks of outbreeding, particularly in the second generation, are on par with the risks of inbreeding. Predicting the relative risks in any particular situation is complicated by variation among taxa, characters being measured, level of divergence between hybridizing populations, mating history, environmental conditions and the potential for inbreeding and outbreeding effects to be occurring simultaneously. Further work on consequences of interpopulation hybridization is sorely needed with particular emphasis on the taxonomic scope, the duration of fitness problems and the joint effects of inbreeding and outbreeding. Meanwhile, managers can minimize the risks of both inbreeding and outbreeding by using intentional hybridization only for populations clearly suffering from inbreeding depression, maximizing the genetic and adaptive similarity between populations, and testing the effects of hybridization for at least two generations whenever possible.


["Hybridization between divergent populations or species can result in increased fitness in some cases, but it is generally expected to result in reduced fitness."]